Saturday, May 22, 2010

Heterosexualising and selling away Indian warrior traditions and values

Here is a nauseating incidence of how the forces of heterosexualization as part of India's westernization, are going about their business. An ancient masculine, warrior tradition, that guarded strictly against even seeing women, leave alone touching them or having them enter their spaces, is now being converted into an obscene heterosexual practise, together with the heterosexualization of all its rules and customs.

Of course, there is a lot of money to be made into this process as well. The western forces of heterosexualization are more than happy to destroy the indigenous men's spaces, just as they destroyed those in their own cultures.

So, once Kalaripayattu and everything that it entails is sufficiently heterosexualized, what option will men have but to submit to indignity in front of women, if they want to avail of Kalaripayattu -- and often they can't even avoid that, when faced with peer pressure and a personal psychological pressure to develop their heterosexual desire to the maximum in order to fit into the westernized, heterosexualized concept of manhood.

A woman stripping a guy naked and performing foot massage on him? That is not only feminizing an essentially masculine tradition, that is leaving men no dignity, no personal spaces. Of course, when the forces of westernization redefine manhood as 'heterosexual desire' men cannot complain about this without losing their manhood as well.

Comeon!! Kalaripayattu is a manly tradition. Not an affair for the girly male. Please leave it alone ... Let these whores who want another excuse to usurp men's spaces and to sexually humiliate men, do it in their own country, not ours.

Here's a link to this obnoxious site:

http://www.dhanurvedam.com/gallery.html

Note that on the site, men don't massage naked women. That is a typical western attitude. While women's dignity, privacy and spaces are protected from men, there's no one to protect men's spaces or dignity or privacy. Women ought to be protected from men's sexuality, but men don't need protection from women's sexuality. That is exactly the opposite of how things naturally stand.