Heterosexualising and selling away Indian warrior traditions and values

Here is a nauseating incidence of how the forces of heterosexualization as part of India's westernization, are going about their business. An ancient masculine, warrior tradition, that guarded strictly against even seeing women, leave alone touching them or having them enter their spaces, is now being converted into an obscene heterosexual practise, together with the heterosexualization of all its rules and customs.

Of course, there is a lot of money to be made into this process as well. The western forces of heterosexualization are more than happy to destroy the indigenous men's spaces, just as they destroyed those in their own cultures.

So, once Kalaripayattu and everything that it entails is sufficiently heterosexualized, what option will men have but to submit to indignity in front of women, if they want to avail of Kalaripayattu -- and often they can't even avoid that, when faced with peer pressure and a personal psychological pressure to develop their heterosexual desire to the maximum in order to fit into the westernized, heterosexualized concept of manhood.

A woman stripping a guy naked and performing foot massage on him? That is not only feminizing an essentially masculine tradition, that is leaving men no dignity, no personal spaces. Of course, when the forces of westernization redefine manhood as 'heterosexual desire' men cannot complain about this without losing their manhood as well.

Comeon!! Kalaripayattu is a manly tradition. Not an affair for the girly male. Please leave it alone ... Let these whores who want another excuse to usurp men's spaces and to sexually humiliate men, do it in their own country, not ours.

Here's a link to this obnoxious site:

http://www.dhanurvedam.com/gallery.html

Note that on the site, men don't massage naked women. That is a typical western attitude. While women's dignity, privacy and spaces are protected from men, there's no one to protect men's spaces or dignity or privacy. Women ought to be protected from men's sexuality, but men don't need protection from women's sexuality. That is exactly the opposite of how things naturally stand.

In heterosexualized spaces even friendship can only be between boy-girl or two girls; no male-male even as simple friends!!

An application for sending scraps with pictures on orkut, has different themes for different scraps. It's divided into categories like 'celebrations', 'icebreakers', 'love', 'friendship', 'tease', etc.

It would be too much to expect a any society, leave alone a heterosexualized society to show figures of two males in the love section. But, yes, you'd expect to see at least some representation of two girls or two boys together in the friendship section. However, heterosexualized spaces have socially engineered such fear of any kind of intimacy between men, even plain friendship, because it portrays all of them as 'homosexual' (and thus unmanly and third gender).

Therefore, eventhough an Indian has desgined it, and it is clear that it is a man who designed this, because women don't have anything to worry about by showing two men as friends -- the friendship section contains illustrations of two girls together as friends. One of them even shows two girls as kissing (friends?) and a heart sign. There are other illustrations where a girl and a boy are shown together to represent friendship. BUT, there are no images of two men as friends... since the creator would be too scared to be labelled 'gay' if he does that. So, in heterosexualized societies, at least at formal level, any social bonding can only be between two opposite sexes -- be it love or even simple friendship. And unless the designer has something to hide he will not be so scared... but then don't all 'straight' men have something to hide as far as their desires for another man are concerned?

And the Western society still thinks of itself as superior, manly and an open society! How hypocrite can you get. Everything about Western society is a sham... a pretense... double standards... unnatural... artificial... including its heterosexuality and homosexuality.

Believe it or not, this is just pure friendship... nothing wrong in it for heterosexualized societies if straight women kiss...

And believe it or not, this is also an illustration of friendship... but no two males as friends... that's unacceptable for men who are labelled 'heterosexual'.

 And this is the icebreaking section... again between a man and a woman... I mean why would a 'straight' man want to break ice with a man...??? uggggghhhh!!!

.....

Forcing man and woman to hug on TV...

This evening there was this AXN like TV programme on some Indian Channel in it, where Akhsay Khanna was asking an assortment of men and women to do daredevil acts on camera.

A man had just completed a feat and he was all wet. His team mate, some girl congratulated him verbally. But Akshay asked him to hug the guy. I mean this is the limit of being a copy cat -- trying to do everything the way they do it in the west, complete with showing heterosexual intimacy, even if it is anti-Indian in its essence.

Neither the girl want to do it nor the guy. They both didn't know what to do... the guy tried to save the situation by saying... oh, its too cold, she'll get wet, but Akshay insisted. For the Forces of Heterosexualisation, he was being the hero. He was doing the right thing, as per their narrow thinking.

So, the girl finally had to go and give the man such a hesitating and unwanted hug. When will they come to their senses?

Post Case Studies about Heterosexualisation

You can post here Case Studies about Heterosexualisation.